Image format comparison

Nine formats, and only three or four of them are worth choosing for a new project. This table puts the differences side by side, including the ones that decide whether a format will work at all.

The comparison table

Read the first four columns to decide whether a format can do the job; read the last to decide whether it is pleasant to use. Browser support is the column that most often rules a format out, regardless of its technical merits.

FormatCompressionTransparencyAnimationBit depthBrowser supportBest for
JPGLossy onlyNoNo8-bitEverythingPhotographs, maximum compatibility
PNGLossless onlyYes (8-bit alpha)Yes (APNG)8 or 16-bitEverythingLogos, screenshots, text, transparency
WebPLossy + losslessYesYes8-bitEvery current browserThe safe modern default for the web
AVIFLossy + losslessYesYes10 or 12-bitChrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari 16+Smallest files, HDR, gradients
GIFLossless, 256 coloursBinary onlyYes8-bit paletteEverythingSimple animations, small graphics
HEICLossy + losslessYesSequences10-bitApple devices, OS codecsiPhone photos before export
TIFFUsually losslessYesMulti-pageUp to 16-bit+Limited (Safari only)Scans, print masters, archives
BMPUncompressedRarelyNo8/24/32-bitEverythingLegacy Windows software
SVGVector (not raster)YesYes (CSS/SMIL)N/A (vector)EverythingLogos, icons, diagrams, anything scalable

What each format costs you

Size comparisons are the easiest way to pick wrongly, because they depend on the image. The ordering is stable though: AVIF smallest, then WebP, then JPG, with PNG far behind for photographs and far ahead for flat graphics.

Advertisement

Which conversions lose what

The direction of a conversion decides what survives. Moving to a format with fewer capabilities always discards something, and moving back never recovers it.

ConversionSizeQualityWhat is lost
Any → JPGSmallerSlight lossTransparency becomes white; 10-bit colour drops to 8-bit
Any → PNGMuch larger for photosNo further lossAnimation (unless APNG) and metadata
Any → WebPSmallerSlight loss (if lossy)Compatibility with older desktop software
Any → AVIFSmallestSlight lossEditor support; encoding is Chromium-only in browsers
JPG → PNGMuch largerNo gainNothing recovered - the detail was already gone
PNG → JPGMuch smallerSlight lossTransparency and any 16-bit depth
GIF → PNG/JPGSmallerNo further lossEvery frame except the first

Cite this page

Free to cite. Copy the reference below, or link to this page directly.

PicConv. "Image format comparison". https://picconv.com/resources/image-format-comparison/ (accessed 2026-11-01).

https://picconv.com/resources/image-format-comparison/

Tools that use this

Frequently asked questions

Which format should I use for a website?

WebP as the default, AVIF with a WebP or JPG fallback if you control the markup and want the smallest files. Keep the original masters in whatever format they came in.

Is PNG better quality than JPG?

PNG is lossless, so it never loses quality - but that only matters for graphics, screenshots and repeated editing. For a photograph, PNG is several times larger than JPG at a quality nobody can distinguish.

Can I convert HEIC to JPG without losing quality?

Not fully: JPG is 8-bit and lossy, while HEIC is 10-bit. Most photographs survive the conversion invisibly; banding can appear in smooth gradients. Converting to PNG avoids further loss but produces a much larger file.

Why does my GIF lose its animation when converted?

Most image formats cannot store multiple frames. Converting a GIF to PNG or JPG keeps only the first frame. Use a dedicated video-to-GIF or GIF tool if animation must survive.

Is SVG a raster format?

No. SVG stores shapes as coordinates and curves, so it scales without losing sharpness and stays tiny. It is right for logos, icons and diagrams, and wrong for photographs, which are inherently raster.

← All reference tables